Blog

Diagnostic Specificity in Adult Populations In public law care proceedings, the assessment of neurodevelopmental conditions such as Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in parents frequently informs the parenting capacity assessment. These conditions, which often manifest with executive dysfunction, difficulties with emotional regulation, and impairments in social communication, require careful identification…

Clinical Frameworks in Parole Review Parole Board reviews require the synthesis of complex clinical and historical data to assist the panel in assessing the risk posed by an offender should they be released into the community. Unlike criminal trial evidence focused on specific intent or fitness to plead, the focus here is prospective: evaluating whether…

In personal injury and clinical negligence litigation, Functional Neurological Disorder (FND) represents a significant intersection between neurology and psychiatry. Establishing a coherent theory of causation requires the court to distinguish between the primary neurological presentation and secondary psychiatric sequelae, which can influence the valuation of damages. Solicitors must exercise precision when instructing experts to ensure…

In family and child proceedings, the assessment of parental capacity frequently requires the input of clinical experts to assist the court in determining the welfare and safety of children. Distinguishing between the contributions of a clinical psychologist and those of a consultant psychiatrist is essential for ensuring that the instruction addresses the specific clinical or…

In the context of the Mental Health Act (MHA) 1983, the robustness of a treatment plan serves as a significant clinical component in evaluating continued detention or restrictive practice. For legal practitioners representing patients at First-tier Tribunals, scrutinising MHA treatment plan records is essential to assessing whether the detaining authority has addressed its statutory obligations….

The Clinical Basis of Diminished Responsibility In criminal proceedings within England and Wales, the plea of diminished responsibility serves as a partial defence to murder, reducing the conviction to manslaughter under section 2 of the Homicide Act 1957 (as amended by the Coroners and Justice Act 2009). The forensic psychiatrist is frequently instructed to assess…

Clinical Context and Legal Thresholds In criminal proceedings, psychiatric evidence plays a critical role in determining issues related to an individual’s mental state at the time of an offence or during trial. Solicitors instructing experts must ensure that the scope of the psychiatric report aligns with the specific legal thresholds for diminished responsibility under the…

The Role of Psychological Autopsies in Inquest Proceedings In inquest proceedings, particularly where the deceased died in state custody or under the care of psychiatric services, the court may seek a retrospective evaluation of the individual’s mental state. A psychological autopsy is a structured forensic investigation designed to reconstruct the deceased’s state of mind, intent,…

The Clinical Intersection of Trauma and Memory In asylum appeals, psychiatric and psychological evidence often addresses cases where an appellant’s credibility is challenged due to perceived inconsistencies in their account. The interplay between trauma-related symptoms and cognitive functioning can complicate the gathering of evidence. Instructing solicitors should consider the necessity of specialist assessment to assist…

In Court of Protection proceedings, the instruction of a Single Joint Expert (SJE) is a mechanism intended to manage the proportionality of expert evidence. While the court may direct that evidence be given by one expert under rule 15.12 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017, the process of instructing that expert is governed by…